Skip to main content

(DAY 910) The Inevitability of Interview Ghosting

· 3 min read
Gaurav Parashar

Conducting interviews for the Gurgaon office has become an exercise in managing expectations against a predictable pattern of attrition throughout the hiring process. A significant portion of this attrition manifests as candidate ghosting, a phenomenon where individuals cease all communication after initially expressing strong interest. This disappearance occurs at various stages: after the application is acknowledged, following the scheduling of a video interview, or, most frustratingly, after a verbal offer is extended. This behavior has become an accepted, albeit inefficient, part of the recruitment landscape. The process demands a substantial investment of time and resources from the organization, from screening resumes and coordinating calendars to conducting multiple rounds of discussion, and its abrupt termination by the candidate without notice renders that investment void.

A particular nuance of Gurgaon exacerbates this issue, namely the geographical expectations of candidates residing in Delhi and Noida. Many applicants confidently assert their willingness and ability to commute, viewing the distance as a negligible factor during the initial stages of discussion. However, as the prospect transitions from abstract possibility to concrete reality, the practical implications of a daily inter-city commute appear to settle in. The significant time commitment, the cost of travel, and the unreliability of traffic often lead to a reassessment. This realization frequently does not result in a formal withdrawal but in silent disengagement. The candidate simply stops responding, perhaps finding it easier to avoid the discomfort of declining than to confront it directly, leaving the hiring team in a state of unresolved suspension.

This pattern highlights a broader space for improvement in professional courtesy among a segment of the candidate pool. The process of applying, filling out detailed forms, and booking video meetings represents a mutual investment of time. A candidate's participation signals a serious intent, and their subsequent unexplained absence represents a breakdown of that professional contract. While individuals are undoubtedly free to pursue or decline opportunities, the method of withdrawal is telling. Ghosting reflects a avoidance of difficult communication rather than a conscious decision to prioritize one’s own needs. It indicates a development area in professional communication skills, where providing a simple, timely notice of withdrawal is a basic expectation that is often unmet.

From an operational standpoint, this behavior necessitates building buffers and contingencies into the hiring workflow. It is imprudent to consider any role filled until the candidate has physically joined and completed initial onboarding. This means maintaining a pipeline of active candidates for longer and managing internal expectations about time-to-fill metrics. The emotional investment in any single candidate must be tempered, as the likelihood of last-minute disappearance is a real variable in the equation. This is not a reflection of cynicism but a practical adaptation to a consistent market behavior. The process becomes less about finding the perfect candidate on the first try and more about systematically navigating through attrition until a reliable match is secured.

Ultimately, this recurring experience serves as a reminder of the inherent uncertainties in building a team. While ghosting is an operational inefficiency and a minor professional frustration, it is also a filter. A candidate who lacks the professionalism to communicate their decision, regardless of what it is, is likely not a suitable cultural fit for an organization that values accountability and clear communication. Their disappearance, while momentarily disruptive, is a form of self-selection that prevents a potentially more costly mis-hire later. The process continues, therefore, with an understanding that a certain volume of interaction will be lost, but that the successful outcome is ultimately determined by finding the individual for whom the opportunity is the right fit, geographically and professionally.