Skip to main content

(DAY 1009) Living With Dust and Doubt in NCR

· 4 min read
Gaurav Parashar

Pollution in NCR has stopped feeling like an event and has settled into the background as a condition, something persistent rather than alarming. For months now, the air has carried a thickness that is hard to ignore, even on days when the numbers briefly improve. Dust coats surfaces inside homes that are supposedly sealed from the outside. Cars collect a dull grey film within hours of being washed. The throat feels dry without a clear reason, and eyes burn slightly even without exposure to smoke. This has become the normal setting for daily life. The question that keeps coming up, quietly and repeatedly, is whether it is worth living here at all when the cost is measured in breath, sleep quality, and long-term health risks. That question no longer feels dramatic. It feels practical.

What stands out most is not just the pollution itself, but its duration. This is not a bad week or a seasonal spike that can be waited out. It stretches across months, blending post-monsoon dust, construction debris, vehicular emissions, crop burning, and winter inversion into one long stretch of compromised air. There is no clear boundary where it starts or ends. Masks come out, air purifiers are switched on, and outdoor plans are quietly cancelled without discussion. Exercise shifts indoors, if it happens at all. Windows remain shut even when the weather would otherwise invite them open. Living spaces become sealed boxes, designed to keep the outside away. Over time, this changes how the city feels, not just physically but mentally. The environment trains people to expect discomfort, to plan around harm rather than around comfort or growth.

Health concerns stop being abstract in this setting. They show up in coughs that do not fully go away, in a baseline fatigue that feels unrelated to workload, in children and older people being advised to stay inside indefinitely. Doctors repeat advice that is already known: avoid outdoor exposure, use filters, stay hydrated. None of this addresses the core issue, which is that avoidance is not a long-term strategy. There is a quiet calculation happening in many households, even if it is not spoken aloud. It weighs career stability, family proximity, and cultural familiarity against lungs, heart health, and the unknown future cost of prolonged exposure. For some, this calculation ends with plans to leave. For others, it ends with resignation. Both outcomes carry a sense of loss, either of place or of control.

The dust is perhaps the most visible and psychologically exhausting part of this experience. Unlike invisible gases, dust announces itself constantly. It gathers on floors, desks, and shelves, making cleanliness feel temporary and slightly futile. It enters despite closed doors and windows, settling into fabrics and electronics. There is a sense that nothing is truly protected. This constant intrusion erodes the idea of home as a refuge. Instead, home becomes a managed environment that requires machines to simulate what should be natural. Air purifiers hum in the background like necessary appliances, not optional comforts. Filters are checked and replaced with regularity. Electricity consumption rises, adding another layer of dependence and cost. The simple act of breathing becomes mediated by technology.

Living in NCR during these months also reshapes social behavior. Outdoor gatherings reduce without anyone formally deciding to reduce them. Parks are empty even when the weather is mild. Morning walks disappear from routines. Conversations increasingly include air quality readings, not as news but as context. People check pollution levels the way they check the weather, knowing it will influence the day but not expecting it to improve meaningfully. This constant low-grade stress accumulates. It does not announce itself as anxiety, but it shows up as irritability, reduced patience, and a general sense of weariness. The city feels heavier, not just in air density but in mood. It becomes harder to imagine long-term plans rooted here when the present itself feels compromised.

The most difficult part is the normalization of all this. Once something becomes routine, it stops triggering urgency. Complaints lose intensity. Outrage fades into tired commentary. The body adapts in ways that are not necessarily healthy, and the mind learns to accept constraints it would have rejected earlier. Asking whether it is worth living here starts to feel less like a protest and more like a personal audit. There is no clear answer, only trade-offs. For now, life continues within these limits, shaped by dust, filtered air, and cautious routines. Writing this down feels like a way to mark the reality without exaggeration, to acknowledge the cost without dramatizing it. Whether this is sustainable is an open question, one that does not need an immediate answer but does deserve to be asked honestly.